Hi Bill:

>From William_de_la_Vega/CAM/Lotus@lotus.com Mon Nov 23 09:43:45 1998
>To: ichenp@ccs.neu.edu
>cc: lieber@ccs.neu.edu
>Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1998 09:47:23 -0500
>Subject: Re: Questions
>Mime-Version: 1.0
>
>> Dear Prof Mezini,
>>  I have a question about the new pseudo code of APPC-Beans. It seems to
>> me that the method traversalEvent(NodeEventObject nodeEvObj) in
>...
>
>Good question I-Chen.

I agree!

>
>It gets to the heart of what you noticed about the code similarity. I did not
>notice this change. I would like to hear what Prof. Lieberherr thinks of this.

Just sent my response in previous message.

>Perhaps you could work on the APPC Bean or both of us could work on the
>Traversal Bean together (despite my earlier apprehensions).

Either way is good; whatever works best for you.

>
>As for me:
>- updated the code from David Lorenz's reorganization
>- started working with the tg library
>- about 50% of the way to having a Traversal Bean that utilizes the the TG
>library
>It has a method
>     public void traverse(
>          NamedClassGraph icg,
>          StrategyGraphI ts,
>          NamedClassGraph ccg,     // unused
>          Dictionary map,                // unused
>          Object obj);

Let's see: The Traversal Bean traverses an object obj of the
concrete class graph ccg. Why is ccg unused?

>
>To do that I implemented classes Edge, Vertex, and NamedClassGraph. I still have
>to add some methods so that they support the interfaces of the tg library. Also,
>they need testing.
>
>I will post on Wednesday morning (in whatever state of completion they are in).
>Let me know if you want to see them sooner. I will switch to using one zip file
>as Prof. Lorenz has done.
>
>
>
-- Karl