Subject: Re: HW1 Parts A and B
From: Karl Lieberherr (lieber@ccs.neu.edu)
Date: Mon Oct 01 2001 - 17:47:42 EDT
Hi Fabio:
yes, please use any reasonable approximation to the UML
notation that is convenient to draw with your tool of choice.
I did the same in my Powerpoint slides.
-- Karl
>From frojas_01@yahoo.com Mon Oct 1 16:46:12 2001
>Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2001 13:46:06 -0700 (PDT)
>From: Fabio Rojas <frojas_01@yahoo.com>
>Subject: HW1 Parts A and B
>To: Karl Lieberherr <lieber@ccs.neu.edu>
>
>Prof Lieberherr,
>
>I have a question about the notation for the HW. I am using
>edges with a filled in arrow for "has-a" and those with a
>non-shaded arrow for "is-a". But this isn't strict UML as
>far as I can tell from the files at Rational.com
>
>Is it ok if we use the notation you used in the lectures
>for this excercise or do you want us to use strict UML?
>
>Thank you,
>Fabio
>
>=====
>"If there is no great glorious end to all this--if nothing we do matters--then all that matters is what we do, 'cause that's all there is. What we do. Now. Today"
>
>__________________________________________________
>Do You Yahoo!?
>Listen to your Yahoo! Mail messages from any phone.
>http://phone.yahoo.com
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Mon Oct 01 2001 - 17:47:50 EDT