|
Programming Skills |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Programming in
the Small |
|
|
|
|
| Skill Level |
Program
Synthesis |
Program
Analysis |
Program Design |
Program
Composition |
Program
assessment |
|
| Expert Context-free
and situational. No longer relies on
the analytical principle. Demonstrates a deep understanding of situation.
Shows long background of experience; intuitive; holistic;and formal
education preparation. |
|
|
|
Expert in program design:
Selects appropriate structure from alternatives.
Uses a standard structure and adapts it with extreme ease.
Evaluates the costs and benefits of using structures and algorithms
with extreme ease.
Uses sophisticated design techniques with extreme ease.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Details |
Examples |
Details |
Examples |
Details |
Examples |
Details |
Example |
Details |
|
Example |
|
| Proficient Context-free
and situational. Begins to make
decisions rather than merely following rules. Hones in on accurate region
of problem. Perceive situations as
wholes, Maxims are used to guide with deep understanding of the situation
and provide directions to what is important to take into consideration. |
|
| Proficient in program synthesis:
Solves small "pattern" problems with reasonable ease. Writes good programs of 250 lines. Recognizes common opertions and easily
names these operations.
6 - 7 pts. |
|
Proficient in program analysis:
Context-free. Performs all
the following tasks without merely following rules. Hones in on the
problem relatively quickly for all the following:
-use abstract data types
-identify bugs in a small program and fix them
-identify the scope of an identifier
-correlate assignments with potential uses of the value assigned
-write a conditional dispatch
-formulate the post-condition of a while loop
-identify the base and recursive cases of a simple recursion
-hand simulate a small piece of code
|
|
Proficient in program
design: Begins
to be able to select the appropriate structure from alternatives
Beginning to:
-use a standard structure and adapt it
-evaluate the costs and benefits of using structures and
algorithms
-use some sophisticated techniques
|
|
Proficient in program
composition:
Can easily define requirements and produce specifications.
Has intamite knowledge of tools and environments.
Effectively intergrates higher level programming components.
Good team worker.
|
|
Proficient in program
assessment:
Accurately determines measures for program assesment.
Applies techniques for assessment with reasonable quickness.
Certifies the program quality with reasonable ease.
|
|
|
| |
Details |
Examples |
Details |
Examples |
Details |
Examples |
Details |
Example |
Details |
|
Example |
|
| Competent Context-free
and situational. More experience
acquired. Senses what is missing.
Sees actions in terms of long-range plans and goals. Equivalent to two to three years on the
job; establishes plan and perspective;
Lacks speed and flexibility; efficient and organized; supported and
reinforced institutionally. |
|
| Competent in program synthesis: Able
to recognize common operations. With
time is able to write program.
Ability in solving small pattern problems acceptable.
4 - 5pts. |
|
Competent in program analysis: :
uses abstract data types
identify bugs in a small program and fix them
identify the scope of an identifier
correlate assignments with potential uses of the value assigned
write a conditional dispatch
formulate the post-condition of a while loop
identify the base and recursive cases of a simple recursion
hand simulate a small piece of code
|
|
Competent in program design:
select appropriate structure from alternatives
use a standard structure and adapt it
evaluate the costs and benefits of using structures and
algorithms
use some sophisticated techniques
|
|
Competent in program
composition:
Competent in defining requirements and producing specifications.
Has knowledge of tools and environments
Incoporates higher level programming components
Effective team worker.
|
|
Competent in program
assessment:
Beginning to show more experience acquired. Senses what is missing. Equivalent to two
to three years in applying techniques for assessment; Sometimes shows an
understanding of a plan and perspective in certifying the program quality;
Lacks speed and flexibility; Shows efficient and organized understanding of
program assessment measures; Still seems to need some support and
reinforcement for assessment techniques. |
|
|
| |
Details |
Examples |
Details |
Examples |
Details |
Examples |
Details |
Example |
Details |
|
Example |
|
| Advanced beginner: Context-Free. Recognizes
elements when present. Perceives
similarity with prior examples.
Demonstrates marginally acceptable performance; enough real
situational experience to remember meaningful situational aspects; can not
make aspects explicit and completely objective; tend to go on instructor’s
guidelines; treat all attributes and aspects equally important; Needs
support and help in setting priorities. |
|
| Advanced Beginner in program synthesis: Has
some difficulty recognizing common operations. Writes programs with limited
difficulty. Improved ability in
solving small "pattern problems.
2-3 pts. |
|
Advanced Beginner: use
abstract data types
identify bugs in a small program and fix them
identify the scope of an identifier
correlate assignments with potential uses of the value assigned
write a conditional dispatch
formulate the post-condition of a while loop
identify the base and recursive cases of a simple recursion
hand simulate a small piece of code
|
|
Advanced Beginner in program
design:
select appropriate structure from alternatives
use a standard structure and adapt it
evaluate the costs and benefits of using structures and
algorithms
use some sophisticated techniques
|
|
Advanced Beginner in program
composition:
define requirements and produce specifications
Has knowledge of tools and environments.
higher level programming components
Functional team worker.
|
|
Advanced Beginner in program
assessment:
Slightly recognizes elements when present for measuring program
assessment. Perceives similarity
with prior examples. Demonstrates
marginally acceptable understanding of assessment; can not make aspects
explicit and completely objective; Still relies on instructor’s guidelines
for assessment; treats all attributes and techniques for assessment equally
important; Needs support and help in trying to certify the program quality. |
|
|
| |
Details |
Examples |
Details |
Examples |
Details |
Examples |
Details |
Example |
Details |
|
Example |
|
| Novice: Context-Free - . Acquisition of new skill. Recognizes objective facts, features and
general rules. Actions based on fact
and features. Beginner; No
experience; Uses objective attributes, tends to go with what is taught, No
discretionary judgment, go by context-free rules (does not know the
exceptions to the rules). |
|
| Novice in program synthesis: Has
difficulty recognizing common operations.
Difficulty writing programs.
Limited ability in solving small "pattern problems.
0 - 1 pts. |
|
Novice in program analysis: Has
difficulty recognizing abstract data types
Recognizes bugs in a small program and is beginning to understand how
to fix them
Beginning to:
-identify the scope of an identifier
-correlate assignments with potential uses of the value assigned
-write a conditional dispatch
-formulate the post-condition of a while loop
-identify the base and recursive cases of a simple recursion
-hand simulate a small piece of code
|
|
Novice in program
design: Has
difficulty selecting appropriate structure from alternatives.
Has difficulty using a standard structure and adapting it.
Unable evaluate the costs and benefits of using structures and
algorithms
Unable to use some sophisticated techniques
|
|
Novce in program composition:
Can define requirements and produce specifications with limited
difficulty.
Has rudamentary knowledge of tools and environments
Attempts to use higher level programming components.
Can work in a team.
|
|
Novice in program assessment:
Cannot measure for assessment of programs.
Cannot apply the techniques for assessment.
Has problems in understanding the process of certifying the program
quality
Cannot certify the program quality. |
|
|
| |
Details |
Examples |
Details |
Examples |
Details |
Examples |
Details |
Example |
Details |
|
Example |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|