|
1
|
|
|
2
|
- Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA
- 18,000 undergraduates (full and part-time)
- 4,000 graduate students (full and part-time)
- 700 Undergraduate students In CCIS
- CCIS Masters and PHD programs
- 5 year undergraduate co-op program
- Alternating co-op program. Required for undergraduates, optional for master’s students
- 200 students on co-op per term
|
|
3
|
- Revised curriculum to include academics and
- co-op
- Inform academic faculty of what students learn on co-op
- Help students better understand and monitor their learning on co-op
- Inform employers about student skill sets,
- leading to better co-op positions and a better “fit”
|
|
4
|
- Continuing to assess knowledge, skills and abilities required to
successfully compete in the computing field.
- Identification of measurable criteria for the identified skills through
surveys and focus groups
- Documentation to reflect the skill development level based on measurable
criteria.
|
|
5
|
- Brief history of assessment activities
- Brief introduction to CCIS learning objectives
- Sample rubrics from learning goals
- Discussion of focus groups
- Culminating in an advanced portfolio structure
|
|
6
|
- Surveys to find out what is learned
- Student, employers & faculty: 58 skills, 18 categories
- Exposure (Coop Class or other)
- Proficiency
- Importance of skill
- Need for more objective measures.
- Issues of accuracy & consistency
- Introduction of new student evaluation this year.
- Students and employers assess skill level versus job skill level
|
|
7
|
- Learning (knowledge and skills)
- We know that skills are learned on co-op as well as the classroom
- Detailed learning goals for CCIS curriculum are well established
- includes classroom and co-op learning goals
- Skills learned in one place are reinforced in the other
- Model, based on research, for
where skills are introduced and reinforced
|
|
8
|
- Assessment
- What is learned in each setting?
- How to maximize knowledge integration?
- How do classroom and co-op reinforce each other?
- How do we measure learning?
- How do we communicate and store?
|
|
9
|
- Programming skills
- Technical knowledge
- Theoretical foundations
- Technical judgment
- Complexity, design, and abstraction
- Communications and learning
- Effective work and problem solving
|
|
10
|
- A rubric is a set of categories that define and describe the important
components of the work being completed, critiqued, or assessed
- Each category contains a gradation of levels of completion or competence
with a score assigned to each level and a clear description of what
criteria need to be met to attain the score at each level
|
|
11
|
- Novice
- Advanced beginner
- Competent
- Expert
- Proficient
|
|
12
|
- Synthesis
- Analysis
- Design
- Composition
- Assessment
|
|
13
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
16
|
- Faculty, students and employers
- Positive response
- Better understanding of curriculum and skill levels
- Dynamic tension assessment details vs. ease of documentation
- Selective rating of skills
|
|
17
|
- Culmination of assessment efforts
- Present direct objective evidence of attainment of goals
- Forum to present what students have learned.
- Self, Co-op & Academic Faculty, Employers
- Interdisciplinary collaboration
|
|
18
|
|
|
19
|
- www.ccs.neu.edu/co-op/WACE/index.htm
|