|
1
|
|
|
2
|
- Mark Erickson, Co-op Coordinator/Advising Coordinator
- Nora Jemison, Co-op Coordinator/Advising Coordinator
- Mel Simms, Co-op Coordinator
- John Spadaccini, Co-op Counselor
- Aileen Yates, Employer Relations Coordinator
|
|
3
|
- Resent findings from student co-op evaluations
- Issues of concern and your support
- The on-line E-portfolio project
- Discussion
|
|
4
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
6
|
- Assumption:
- If quality co-op assignments are available, than student satisfaction
with the integration of their co-op experiences and their academic
program will be positive.
- The co-op component
- 18 months of full-time co-op (3 co-ops, 6 months each)
|
|
7
|
- Quality Co-op Positions:
- Each student co-op experience has learning objectives which are
progressively more challenging as they move through the program.
- In a comprehensive survey of students returning from Spr/Su1 co-op and
Su2/Fall 2004, students rated their assignments according to quality as
defined by:
- “Challenging with positive supervision and mentoring which attempts to
match the student’s technical, developmental and professional
abilities”
|
|
8
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
12
|
- IS Majors the Growth Implications
- CS & IS Student Expectations and Impact
- Employer Relationships and the Future
|
|
13
|
- Erickson:
- Having enough quality assignments.
- Having difficulty maintaining assignments with single divisions.
|
|
14
|
- Jemison
- Emphasis on programming
- Co-op Assignments – market driven
- Adjusting the expectations
- Projects in class
|
|
15
|
- Aileen
- Employers, students and people for the future
- Strengthening employer relationships
- Activities
- Faculty involvement
|
|
16
|
- Received three year NSF curriculum assessment grant to develop on-line
electronic portfolio
- Nearing the end of the second year of the grant
- Completed initial student pilot and moving forward with
- Designing of the rubrics
- Re-evaluation of learning goals
- Creation of database and structure
- To build structures and multiple views of data
|
|
17
|
- On-line portfolios are HOT, everyone seems to be building a system
- Way to document and share various types of skills or achievements
- Ability to upload “artifacts” or samples of work that demonstrate
abilities
- Many are limited in scope
- I.e. program certification goals
- Showcase work
- Moderate objectives
|
|
18
|
|