<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.ccs.neu.edu/home/riccardo">
<channel>

<title>SIGACT News Logic Column</title>
<description>The Logic Column for SIGACT News, the newsletter of the
ACM Special Interest Group on Algorithms and
Computation.</description>
<link>http://www.ccs.neu.edu/home/riccardo/logic.html</link>
<language>en</language>

<item>
 <title>RSS feed for the SIGACT News Logic Column has moved</title> 
 <description>The SIGACT News Logic Column announcements has been
folded into my blog, Close Encounters of the Logical Kind, found at https://wiki.ccs.neu.edu/display/~riccardo/Close+Encounters+of+the+Logical+Kind.</description>
 <link>https://wiki.ccs.neu.edu/display/~riccardo/Close+Encounters+of+the+Logical+Kind</link>
 <pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 23:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
 <guid>https://wiki.ccs.neu.edu/display/~riccardo/Close+Encounters+of+the+Logical+Kind</guid>
</item>

<item>
 <title>Logic Column 19: Symbolic Model Checking for
Temporal-Epistemic Logics, by Alessio Lomuscio and Wojciech Penczek</title> 
 <description>This article surveys some of the recent work in
verification of temporal epistemic logic via symbolic model checking,
focusing on OBDD-based and SAT-based approaches for epistemic logics
built on discrete and real-time branching time temporal logics.</description>
 <link>http://arxiv.org/abs/0709.0446</link>
 <pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 00:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
 <guid>http://arxiv.org/abs/0709.0446</guid>
</item>

<item>
 <title>Logic Column 18: Alternative Logics: A Book Review.</title> 
 <description>This article discusses two books on the topic of
alternative logics in science: "Deviant Logic", by Susan Haack, and
"Alternative Logics: Do Sciences Need Them?", edited by Paul Weingartner.</description>
 <link>http://arxiv.org/abs/0705.1367</link>
 <pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 00:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
 <guid>http://arxiv.org/abs/0705.1367</guid>
</item>

<item>
 <title>Logic Column 17: A Rendezvous of Logic, Complexity, and
Algebra, by Hubie Chen.</title> 
 <description>This article surveys recent advances in applying
algebraic techniques to constraint satisfaction problems.</description>
 <link>http://arxiv.org/abs/cs.LO/0611018</link>
 <pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 00:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
 <guid>http://arxiv.org/abs/cs.LO/0611018</guid>
</item>

<item>
 <title>Logic Column 16: Higher-Order Abstract Syntax: Setting the
Record Straight, by Karl Crary and Robert Harper</title> 
 <description>This article responds to a critique of higher-order
abstract syntax appearing in Logic Column 14, ``Nominal Logic and
Abstract Syntax''.</description>
 <link>http://arxiv.org/abs/cs.LO/0607141</link>
 <pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2006 00:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
 <guid>http://arxiv.org/abs/cs.LO/0607141</guid>
</item>


<item>
 <title>Logic Column 15: Coalgebras and Their Logics, by Alexander Kurz</title> 
 <description>This article describes recent work on the topic of
specifying properties of transition systems. By giving a suitably
abstract description of transition systems as coalgebras, it is
possible to derive logics for capturing properties of these transition
systems in an elegant way.</description>
 <link>http://arxiv.org/abs/cs.LO/0605128</link>
 <pubDate>Sun, 28 May 2006 00:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
 <guid>http://arxiv.org/abs/cs.LO/0605128</guid>
</item>


<item>
 <title>Logic Column 14: Nominal Logic and Abstract Syntax, by James Cheney</title>
 <description> Formalizing syntactic proofs of properties of logics,
programming languages, security protocols, and other formal systems is
a significant challenge, in large part because of the obligation to
handle name-binding correctly. We present an approach called nominal
abstract syntax that has attracted considerable interest since its
introduction approximately six years ago. After an overview of other
approaches, we describe nominal abstract syntax and nominal logic, a
logic for reasoning about nominal abstract syntax. We also discuss
applications of nominal techniques to programming, automated
reasoning, and identify some future directions.</description>
 <link>http://arxiv.org/abs/cs.LO/0511025</link>
 <pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2005 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
 <guid>http://arxiv.org/abs/cs.LO/0511025</guid>
</item>



<item>
 <title>Logic Column 13: Reasoning Formally about Quantum Systems: An Overview, by Nick Papanikolaou</title>
 <description> This article is intended as an introduction to the
subject of quantum logic, and as a brief survey of the relevant
literature. Also discussed here are logics for specification and
analysis of quantum information systems, in particular, recent work by
P. Mateus and A. Sernadas, and also by R. van der Meyden and
M. Patra. Overall, our objective is to provide a high-level
presentation of the logical aspects of quantum theory. Mateus' and
Sernadas' EQPL logic is illustrated with a small example, namely the
state of an entangled pair of qubits. The "KT" logic of van der Meyden
and Patra is demonstrated briefly in the context of the B92 protocol
for quantum key distribution.</description>
 <link>http://arxiv.org/abs/cs.LO/0508005</link>
 <pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2005 00:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
 <guid>http://arxiv.org/abs/cs.LO/0508005</guid>
</item>




</channel>
</rss>
