Subject: RE: Bibtex entry for paper
From: Karl Lieberherr (lieber@ccs.neu.edu)
Date: Wed Oct 09 2002 - 09:43:33 EDT
Hi Richard:
I think that the right Bibtex entry is:
Unpublished Manuscript
for the exact document that I put there.
This unpublished document is a samll variation
of the published document, I believe.
-- Karl
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richard C. Cobbe [mailto:cobbe@ccs.neu.edu]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 8:55 AM
> To: Karl Lieberherr
> Cc: com3205@ccs.neu.edu
> Subject: Re: Bibtex entry for paper
>
>
> Lo, on Tuesday, October 8, Karl Lieberherr did write:
>
> > Hi Richard:
> >
> > Thanks for pointing this out.
> >
> > I could not find an electronic copy of exactly that paper which
> > appears in the bibtex entry. Therefore I left a note at:
> >
> > http://www.ccs.neu.edu/research/demeter/biblio/LoD-formulations.html
> >
> > saying that the given paper only approximates the real paper.
> > Hopefully, the real paper is available at libraries.
>
> Ok, I guess my question was unclear. While the paper described in the
> BibTeX entry may be quite interesting and helpful, that wasn't actually
> what I was looking for.
>
> Rather, I did in fact use the paper that you get by following the link
> (at
> <http://www.ccs.neu.edu/research/demeter/papers/law-of-demeter/law
> -formulations-final/formulationsLoD-1989.ps>),
> and I wanted BibTeX information for that paper so I could cite my
> references easily. In other words, it's more a case of a missing BibTeX
> entry than a missing paper. (I did try to see if the paper itself
> contained enough information to write a BibTeX entry for it, but it
> didn't.)
>
> As the assignment's already been turned in and graded, though, it's a
> bit of an academic issue (pun not intended).
>
> Richard
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Wed Oct 09 2002 - 09:40:26 EDT